Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Cmd_ExecuteString - execute /tell /say etc. from gsc

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Assadministrator kung foo man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    trailerpark
    Posts
    2,011
    Thanks
    2,102
    Thanked 1,084 Times in 753 Posts

    Cmd_ExecuteString - execute /tell /say etc. from gsc

    Ok, first post in this new forum, here we can collect the infos for new updates:

    Code:
    [21:01] Selbie:         case 1204:
            {
                void (*Cmd_ExecuteString)(const char *text);
                (*(int *)&Cmd_ExecuteString) = 0x080609D4;
    
                char *msg;
                int helper = 0;
                helper += stackGetParamString(1, &msg); // todo: is string?
                if (helper < 1)
                {
                    printf_hide("scriptengine> wrongs args for: say(): at least 1 arg\n");
                    return stackReturnInt(0);
                }
                Cmd_ExecuteString(msg);
                return stackPushInt(1);
            }
            
            closer(1204, "say hello");
            closer(1204, "tell 0 hello");
            closer(1204, "status");
            
    [21:01] kung foo man: nice
    [21:01] kung foo man: you can read the return value also?
    [21:01] kung foo man: like /status in a string
    [21:02] Selbie: I haven't tried that. could work. I have tested it to get tell and say working. but more things are looking possible now. it'sfor 1.2 
    [21:02] kung foo man: ah nice
    [21:03] Selbie: just lookup the addr for 'Cmd_ExecuteString' and it should work for 1.3 & 1.7 to
    [21:04] kung foo man: thats like saying "you find the apple tree somewhere" for explaining where it is
    [21:04] Selbie: oh, well
    [21:05] kung foo man: gonna make a forum for libcod
    [21:05] Selbie: I looked into rcon system from q3, went down the same path. I am not quite good with IDa.
    [21:05] kung foo man: then we can collect all infos there
    [21:05] Selbie: good
    [21:05] kung foo man: ah k
    [21:08] kung foo man: ok added
    [21:09] Selbie: ;)
    [21:09] Selbie: 1.2 only, not sure about 1.3 etc
    [21:09] kung foo man: yea mitch or so will search
    [21:13] Selbie: didn't tested it, but 0x08609CC should be the 1.3 value
    timescale 0.01

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to kung foo man For This Useful Post:

    Mitch (9th September 2013)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •